The ((Ordo Amoris" in Max Scheler. Its Relationship to his Value Ethics and to the Concept of Resentment. We will cite a passage from Scheler's essay, Ordo. Max Scheler (–) was an early 20th-century German Continental philosopher in the be understood as a sort of “sixth sense” having an informative objective core: what Scheler termed our Ordo Amoris (or “Logic of the Heart”).‎Overview · ‎Scheler's analysis of the · ‎The connection between. Download Citation on ResearchGate | The “Ordo Amoris” in Max Scheler | We will cite a passage from Scheler's essay, Ordo Amoris, at the beginning of our.


Author: Patricia Wisozk III
Country: Cuba
Language: English
Genre: Education
Published: 4 September 2016
Pages: 701
PDF File Size: 28.29 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.87 Mb
ISBN: 618-2-53405-968-2
Downloads: 76329
Price: Free
Uploader: Patricia Wisozk III


Ordo Amoris

Well, how can it become disordered? We refer every datum, even ourselves, to our sensuous states of feeling, without having a distinct and clear awareness that this is ordo amoris scheler we are doing.

Thus, we can, in clinging to these states of feeling, make even ordo amoris scheler highest spiritual capacities…the slaves of our body and its conditions. In contrast to Kant, for whom the ordering principle of experience resides in the law-giving rational subject, Scheler stressed that human experience exhibits a lawfulness that is given objectively and independently of human organization.

Stratification of emotional life (Scheler)

In contrast to the constructivistic rationalism of Kant, according to which the fundamental principle of lawfulness in human experience is that conferred ordo amoris scheler it by the rational subject, Scheler stressed that this lawfulness is given objectively in the essential structures of experience itself.

The objective order of values is mirrored in the ordo amoris.

Even its disorders are therefore not inscrutable, but fundamentally intelligible, as he shows in his analysis of Ressentiment. Not only the objective order of ordo amoris scheler, but the subjective faculties which apprehend them, have an inherent structured lawfulness.

In fact, the objective order ordo amoris scheler ranks of values is given only in subjective acts of preference. This brings me to the issue that I think is the first real problem with the ordo amoris.

It is a problem that manifests itself in a certain ambiguity, which is related not only to its two-sidedness, but to the way in which Scheler understands the relationship between the rational and the non-rational, the logical and the non-logical.

Scheler's Ordo Amoris: Insights and Oversights | Philip Blosser -

It is an ambiguity that pertains to the scope of the ordo amoris. What does it include and exclude? Which dimensions of experience? Which kinds of subjective acts and objective facts? Ranked from highest to lowest, these include: The first distinguishes feeling-states, affects, reactive responses, ordo amoris scheler feeling-functions, acts of preference, and love and hate.

The second distinguishes sensible, vital, psychic, and spiritual levels of emotion. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 9, Nos. Philosophical Studies 25 [], pp.


In the former, he distinguishes religions, spiritual, vital, and sensible ordo amoris scheler modalities; in the latter, spiritual, psychic, vital and sensible emotional strata. And if so, what becomes of the Pascalian analogy between the logic of the understanding and the logic of the heart?

Furthermore, if there is nothing ultimately against this, then is there any reason why we may not properly differentiate also between corresponding affective faculties of value- awareness by which these values are felt and apprehended?

There are, after all, numerous analogies to emotional feeling in other material regions besides the properly psychical. Yet none of ordo amoris scheler analogies of psychical feeling is exactly identical.

  • Stratification of emotional life (Scheler) - Wikipedia
  • Ordo Amoris by Max Scheler
  • See a Problem?

But in this case, what becomes of the Pascalian analogy? Are there irreducible principles proper to each region and its respective discipline such as aesthetics, economics, or linguisticsand could these be 21 Cf. Dooyeweerd, New Critique, II, op. ordo amoris scheler

Thaumàzein | Rivista di Filosofia

If logic can ordo amoris scheler said to constitute a material region of objects of value-feeling, then what warrant remains for excluding the logic of understanding ordo amoris scheler the scope of the ordo amoris?

The question is wrenching, yet necessary. The basic acts of logical reasoning, which have logic as their proper domain, are analytical. They involve the making of analytical distinctions.


These types of emotions overtake and overcome us, usually quite unexpectedly. We can ordo amoris scheler reason or will to produce such spiritual feelings. As positive experiences, we can only open our hearts and mind and hope that they find us.